Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Timo Stodder vs Naoki Tajima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stodder vs Tajima analysis and find out who is favored!
Timo Stodder vs Naoki Tajima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Stodder 1 - 0 Tajima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stodder has won 47.18% of points on their second serve, while Tajima has won 45.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stodder, in recent form, has won 52.55% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tajima has won 50.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.66% and 39.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stodder has saved 54.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tajima has saved 57.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stodder has won 55.36% of matches played (W/L 31/ 25), with Tajima winning 51.72% (W/L 30/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stodder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 21/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 14/ 11). Tajima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Stodder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 17/ 17), where as Tajima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stodder winning 1 times and Tajima being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Stodder winning 2 and Tajima winning 0. The last match between Stodder and Tajima was at the M15 Heraklion, 26-11-2020, Second, Hard with Timo Stodder getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stodder and Tajima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Stodder winning 0 times and Tajima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Stodder winning 0, and Tajima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stodder has played against opponents with an average rank of 211.93 while Tajima has played against players with an average rank of 88.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stodder has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tajima has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stodder has converted 52.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tajima has converted 44.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
362
Rank
257
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
881
Rank
604
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
65% (197-107)
Career Total W/L
48% (120-131)
38% (5-8)
YTD W/L
50% (16-16)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Timo Stodder vs Naoki Tajima For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Stodder VS Tajima
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Timo Stodder | Naoki Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (42/54) | 45% (37/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (34/42) | 65% (24/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 75% (9/12) | 47% (21/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (37/82) | 20% (11/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Timo Stodder
Player
Naoki Tajima
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
82)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Timo Stodder | Naoki Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (5/8) | 50% (16/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (12/18) | 53% (39/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (135/152) | 52% (347/321) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (13/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 90 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 34 | 124 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:10 | 1:23:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 128.54 | 63.91 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (579/933) | 58% (944/1640) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (359/579) | 68% (643/944) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (167/354) | 46% (320/696) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (41/78) | 45% (88/196) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (376/929) | 43% (739/1702) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 53% (16/14) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (5/12) | 52% (15/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 82% (17/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 18% (17/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 13% (15/2) |
Timo Stodder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Timo Stodder
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Robert Strombachs
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(2) 6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Denis Petak
75%
(
67 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
14
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Marko Maksimovic
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Timo Stodder
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
49%
(
63 of
129)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
10
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
29 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
56 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Naoki Tajima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Chase Ferguson
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Woohyuk Chang
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sora Fukuda
Player
Naoki Tajima
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Shinji Hazawa
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
8
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
78)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Issei Okamura
52%
(
55 of
105)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
6
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
40%
(
20 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kanan Gasimov
Player
Naoki Tajima
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve %
38%
(
6 of
16)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
9 of
14)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
9 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
27
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrin Casanova
Player
Naoki Tajima
53%
(
48 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Mubarak Shannan Zayid
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stodder Vs Tajima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Stodder are available here and Tajima photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
